• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    Method for determining fluorescence values {ϕispe} iE (1,2,…, 1) of a series I of fluorescent microparticles {μPi} iE (1,2,…, 1) of a multiplexed analysis, wherein said microparticles are in a monolayer arrangement , which method comprises: - obtaining a digital fluorescence image from the series of fluorescent microparticles {μPi} iE (1,2, ..., 1); and - calculate a fluorescent value ϕimeas per fluorescent microparticle μPi in the series of fluorescent microparticles {μPi} iE (1,2,…, 1) based solely on pixels of the obtained image corresponding to said fluorescent microparticle μPi. The method comprises calculating the fluorescence value ϕispe of said fluorescent microparticle μPi by correcting its first fluorescence ϕimeas by means of a cross-talk fluorescence contribution ϕcross from said first fluorescence easimeas from other fluorescent microparticles {μPj} j ‡ i in the fluorescent microdream array { μPi} iE (1,2,…, 1).
    公开号:BE1025903B1
    申请号:E2015/5687
    申请日:2015-10-26
    公开日:2019-08-12
    发明作者:David Rebetez；Didier Falconnet；David Bernasconi；Matthieu Gaillard；José Gil
    申请人:Mycartis Nv；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    BE2015 / 5687 CROSS-TALK CORRECTION IN MULTIPLEXING ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC SAMPLE
    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
    The invention relates to biological multiplexing analysis based on the detection of multiple biomarkers in a biological sample, in particular in the diagnosis of complex diseases.
    BACKGROUND
    The diagnosis of complex diseases and the response to treatments are often related to multiple biomolecules instead of one identifiable biomarker. Unlike conventional techniques that measure one analyte at a time, using identical conditions within one assay, multiplexing technologies can measure tens to thousands of different biomolecules, for example proteins or nucleic acids, from one biological sample. In principle, different types of capture molecules, for example antibodies, target proteins, peptides or nucleic acids, are placed in an assay device filled with the sample, each type of capture molecule being designed to form a particular fluorescently labeled complex with the biomarker to be searched in the sample ( commonly called "the fluorescently labeled target biomarker"). One important issue in multiplexing techniques is to determine the fluorescence during the single assay that comes from one type of fluorescently labeled biomarkers bound to their complementary capture molecules (hereinafter "individual fluorescence").
    There are a variety of multiplexing technologies, each of which is usually classified according to their specific coding strategy for this issue. The most popular commercially available multiplexing technologies are array-based and bead-based. With array-based technologies, capture molecules are bound on a panel in a known arrangement to form a 2D array of capture spots, each of which is specifically intended for capturing a particular biomarker. Such planar arrays are thus dependent on x-y coordinates of the capture spots to determine the fluorescence of each biomarker. Bead-based technologies rely on spectrum coding, where color and intensity make it possible to distinguish between each bead population. They have proven to be very flexible and scalable. However, the currently available bead-based systems are designed for cost-effective, batch-wise use, where sufficient samples have to wait to fill the plate to extend the lead time in routine clinical trials. Furthermore, both technologies suffer from slow binding kinetics since they are mainly diffusion driven. This usually results in long sample incubation times, even when
    2015/5687 agitation is used to speed up the process. In addition, a,. , BE2015 / 5687 diffusion-restricted binding regime also contribute to reported strong variations within and between assays.
    To address the above limitations, a multiplexing technology based on coded microparticles and microfluidic channels has been designed. This technology is described, for example, in Rapid, Sensitive and Real-Time Multiplexing Platform for the Analysis of Protein and Nucleic-Acid Biomarkers, Didier Falconnet et al., Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 1582-1589 and the supporting information, which can be downloaded from the website http://pubs.acs.org. One device that embodies this technology is sold under the reference name “Evaluation ™” by MyCartis, Ghent, BE. The most important components of this technology (microparticles that are labeled, microfluidic channel pattern and instrumentation) are now briefly described with reference to Figures 1.
    With reference to Figure 1A, the coded microparticles 10, or "carriers," are disk-shaped, 40 μm in diameter and 10 μm high and produced from silicon wafers, for example using MEMS manufacturing technology. The edge of each micro-particle 10 is unambiguously encoded with the aid of a 10-digit binary code ld to 12, or "identification code", which is formed by the presence or absence of holes 14. The capture molecules are on opposite sides of the micro-particles 10 bonded, the latter thus acting as a solid support for a variety of possible capture molecules, including antibodies, target proteins, peptides, nucleic acids or other biomolecules. More specifically, one type of capture molecules (i.e., capture molecules that are specifically intended for capture of a particular biomarker) is attached to microparticles with the same code ld m .
    Referring to Figure 1B, the cartridge 20, or "assay plate", has a plurality of micro-scale channels 22 that can accommodate mixtures of encoded microparticles and thus allow multiple samples to be taken simultaneously or sequentially (i.e., on different dates) to process. Each channel 22 is made of transparent walls and connects an inlet well 24 with an outlet well 26, which allows pressure increase of the channel 22 above atmospheric pressure, which allows microfluid control of the channel. The channels 22 are at least 5 times, for example 10 times, wider than the diameter of the microparticles and each include a filter structure for enclosing the microparticles in a detection zone of the channel. The height of the channels is optimized for efficient loading and tiling of microparticles. The shallow channel height prevents microparticles from overlapping each other, so that microparticles are arranged in monolayer arrangement in the channel with one of their sides fully available for imaging purposes.
    2015/5687
    BE This microparticle monolayer arrangement in the channel thus allows the use of high resolution imaging for both decoding and fluorescence quantification. Each channel can be loaded with up to thousands of microparticles, whereby a fully charged channel allows multiplexing of more than a hundred different biomarkers with dozens of microparticles for each biomarker to be searched. For multiplexing analysis, a microparticle mixture loaded into a channel comprises a plurality of microparticles that share an identical code, thereby creating a population that provides measurement redundancy for statistical reliability.
    The instrumentation aims at obtaining images from the channel, controlling the fluid actuation and the temperature in the channels and analyzing obtained images. In particular, the instrumentation includes:
    - an optical system 28 with, for example, a long-working lens and a highly sensitive CMOS camera to obtain bright-field and epifluorescence images (e.g., excitation at 640 nm, e.g., using a laser) from the detection zone of the cartridge. The lens is mounted on an automated XYZ platform for scanning each channel during the assay for real-time readout or at the end;
    - illumination system (not shown) for uniform illumination of the detection zone in order to obtain a high-contrast image of the microparticles against a clear background for decoding purposes;
    - a control unit (not shown) for controlling the microfluidic operation of the cartridge (inlet / outlet wells, pressure increase, temperature ...), as well as the operation of the optical system;
    a computing unit 30 (e.g., a personal computer, a server or more generally calculation hardware configured to receive data from the camera and process the data according to instructions stored in a memory.), possibly as part of the control unit or independently thereof, coupled to the camera to receive images therefrom and to perform a multiplexing analysis calculation program to automatically quantify the biomarkers in the examined sample based on the fluorescent and bright light images obtained by the optical system.
    Referring to Figures 2, a multiplex analysis included in the aforementioned multiplexing technology consists of:
    - producing a suspension mixture 32 of microparticles, wherein the microparticles 10 are selected on the basis of the biomarkers to be searched in a examined sample, and loading the liquid mixture 32 of microparticles into the cartridge 20 so that one or more
    2015/5687
    Fill BE channels 22 such that for optimum reading a flat arrangement of the microparticles is provided (Figure 2A);
    loading into the channels 22 the tested liquid sample together with, if necessary, reagents (for example for sandwich reactions), whereby incubation and / or binding reaction in microfluid medium between the biomarkers 34 in the examined sample and the capture molecules bound to the microparticles 10 36 is set in motion (Figure 2B);
    - obtaining images from the detection zone of the channels 22 (e.g. in real time or once at the end of the process). While the microparticles 10 are immobilized in the channels 22 due to pressure increase and filter elements, an image recording cycle preferably consists of successively obtaining a bright field image 38 and a fluorescence image 40 or vice versa, so that the position of each microparticle in both images is the same (Fig. 2C) ;
    - per channel 22 and per pair of bright field and fluorescence image 38, 40 of the channel:
    o analyze of the bright-field image 38 at location X, of each micro-particle 10 in the channels 22 to identify the code and ld to 12 of each micro-particle 10 to be read;
    o analyzing the fluorescence image 40 to determine the fluorescence cp meas of each microparticle 10 in the fluorescent image (e.g. corresponding to the maximum of a kernel density matched to the pixels of the image portion corresponding to the central portion of the microparticle);
    - per channel 22 and per microparticle population 10 that has the same code Id m in the channel:
    o calculating a combined value of fluorescence voor ρορ for the population, for example: applying a Tukey's boxplot filter to cp meas fluorescenties to filter out abnormal cp meas fluorescence values and then calculating the combined value as the arithmetic mean of the remaining fluorescence cp meas (figure 2D);
    o determining the biomarker concentration [h] in the examined sample (or "titration") based on the aggregated value φ ρορ using a stored relationship fluorescence versus concentration (for example table, analytical mathematical model, ...) that is predetermined the biomarker is determined and which is stored in a digital memory of the computing unit 30 (Fig. 2E).
    The calculated concentrations are then displayed for the user and / or stored in a digital memory (for example, that of the computer).
    This multiplexing technology enables (i) short assay times and high reproducibility thanks to a reaction-limited binding regime, (ii) dynamic control of assay conditions and real-time binding monitoring that optimizes multiple
    2015/5687 parameters within one assay round, (iii) compatibility with differences B d E e 2015/5687 immunoassay formats, such as simultaneous co-flowing of the samples and detection of antibodies and thereby simplifying workflows, (iv) analyte quantification based on initial binding rates leading to increased dynamic range of the system and (v) high sensitivity via enhanced fluorescence collection, (vi) optionally, the ability to do a monoplex assay (i.e., providing only one type of capture molecule for quantitative measurement of a certain biomarker).
    In some cases, however, divergence is observed between a biomarker concentration [b] calculated from multiplex assay data and the biomarker concentration calculated from monoplex assay data [b],
    SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
    One object of the invention is to propose the calculation of fluorescence of microparticles in a multiplexing analysis that corrects the difference between multiplex and mono-assays,
    To this end, one object of the invention is a method for determining fluorescences {<p- pe } ie {i, 2 , of a series I of fluorescent microparticles [μΡ,} of a multiplexing analysis, said microparticles being in a monolayer arrangement, which method includes:
    - obtaining a digital fluorescence image of the series of fluorescent microparticles (PAI 16 (1.2 ..... /}; and
    - calculating a first fluorescence per fluorescent microparticle μΡ, in the series of fluorescent microparticles {μΡ ^} /6(1,2,...,/}, based solely on pixels of the corresponding fluorescent microparticle μΡ, obtained statue,
    According to the invention, the method comprises calculating the fluorescence (p ^ pe of said fluorescent microparticle μΡ) by correcting the first fluorescence (pN- eas thereof by means of a cross-talk fluorescence contribution (pi ross in said first fluorescence (p '' eils) from other fluorescent microparticles {pPj} j * i in the series of fluorescent microparticles {μΡ,} ie {lj2 ..... /} ,
    In other words, the part of the obtained image corresponding to a microparticle μΡ 7 · does not strictly correspond to the light produced by said microparticle, Each microparticle produces light that scatters and is thus superimposed on the light of other microparticles, Drawing a parallel with imaging, is between the microparticles
    2015/5687 there is a "cross-talk effect". The cross-talk effect can be particularly observed when at least two populations of microparticles with different fluorescents (e.g., a dark and a clear population) are mixed together. For example, if the fluorescence difference between the two populations is large enough, a fluorescence increase is observed on some microparticles of the darker populations that are near microparticles of the brighter population. Crosstalk can also occur in a monoplex assay.
    According to one embodiment, the calculation of the fluorescence value (p spe :
    - calculating a position X in the digital fluorescence image per fluorescent microparticle μΡι in the series of fluorescent microparticles {μΡί};
    - modeling the first fluorescence value <p ™ eas as a function of the positions and the fluorescence values of all fluorescent microparticles {pPi} mi, 2 ..... ιμ and
    - calculating the inverse of said function in order to obtain the fluorescence value φ · ρβ .
    In one embodiment, the fluorescence <pf pe calculation is performed based on the following equation:
    wherein (pj Pe is the fluorescence of the j the fluorescent microparticle μΡ] and α ^ · is a unitary cross-talk fluorescence contribution in the first fluorescence of the j is the fluorescent microparticle μΡ], where the unitary cross-talk fluorescence contribution α ^ · depends solely on the distance between the fluorescent microparticles μ / 'and μ / 3 ·.
    In other words, for a given microparticle, the light produced by other microparticles does not reduce to a uniform background noise that can be measured (e.g., by calculating the average of the brightness of the image) and subtracted from the fluorescence of the microparticle. The inventors have further noted that disruption from other microparticles is variable depending on the specific arrangement of the microparticles. To correct the cross-talk effect on a microparticle, the invention thus calculates the contribution of any other microparticle. Taking each mentioned contribution into account, this results in multiplex measurement that is comparable to monoplex measurement, even under high contrast conditions under microparticles.
    2015/5687
    Moreover, the inventors have noted that the crosstalk effect can be modeled by the sum of isotro B p E e 2015/5687 decay profiles . This means that one microparticle can be considered independently of the other to calculate its contribution and that the fluorescence scattered by a microparticle depends solely on the distance of the microparticle and the fluorescence on the microparticle. The unitary cross-talk fluorescence contribution α ^ · corresponds, for example, to the normalized fluorescence that generates a microparticle and is calculated on the basis of, for example, constant parameters predetermined by the manufacturer of a multiplex analyzer and stored in the memory of the analyzer.
    In particular, the method includes:
    - calculating a distance d ^ j between the i th and the j the fluorescent microparticle in the digital fluorescence image;
    - calculate per unit microparticles (μ / ',, μΡ /) fluorescent microparticles from the unitary cross-talk fluorescence contribution a, j of said pair (μΡ ί ( μΡ 7 ·) based on the distance
    - calculation of the fluorescences {<p t spe} pe {i, 2, ..., 1} of the set of fluorescent microparticles {jzPJ i e {i, 2, on the basis of the following equation:
    spe ^ 11 spe ( 1 «21 a 12 a l (Il}« 2 (7-1) «1 / 1 « 2 /, n meas x
    Ψ1 , n meas
    Sp2 spe v, -l
    W * / a (Il} l a n «(/ - 1) 2 '« / 2 · / n meas
    ΨΙ-1 <p ™ eas J
    In other words, the calculation is based on two specific reductions, as discussed later, which allows a simple yet very accurate correction of the crosstalk effect.
    In particular, the unitary cross-talk fluorescence of the microparticle in the first fluorescence becomes φ} βα '; of the fluorescent microparticle calculated from the following equation:
    N (Zij = e ~ kn ( di 'J-Pn) ^ n = 1 where N is an integer greater than or equal to 2 and θ η , k n and β η are predetermined parameters.
    2015/5687
    BE Summing up exponential functions is an effective way to model the unitary cross-talk fluorescence contribution, which at the same time offers flexibility of convex optimization for calculating parameters θ η , k n and β η . In particular, three exponential functions are sufficient to calculate a ^ -.
    In one embodiment, each fluorescent microparticle comprises ƒ (/ ', of the series of fluorescent microparticles {μΙ}} i e {i, 2, ..., /} an identification code of a series of different unique identification codes {id m } me ^ 2 ,. .., M], wherein said identification code fd M (i) is readable by processing a digital image of said fluorescent microparticle / f / f, the method further comprising:
    - obtaining a digital image of the series of fluorescent microparticles {pij}, ιβ
    - reading out the identification code 1d m (i) of each microparticle in the digital image; and
    - unique identification codes different from each identification code Id m from the M series {id m } me {i, 2, ..., M} from a combined fluorescence based on the fluorescence (p- pe of the fluorescent microparticles comprising said identification code .
    In particular, each fluorescent microparticle μΡ [from the series of fluorescent microparticles {μΡί} i e {i, 2, ..., /} comprises a surface covered with fluorescent complexes uniquely associated with the identification code ld m (i) belong to said fluorescent microparticle, said complexes comprising first non-fluorescent molecules attached to the microparticles and second fluorescent molecules bound to the first non-fluorescent molecules.
    In particular, the microparticles have the same dimensions.
    In a variation, the method includes:
    - prior to obtaining the digital fluorescence image of the series of fluorescent microparticles {at} .. "place the microparticles in a channel without placing second fluorescent molecules bound to the first non-fluorescent molecules to arrange the microparticles in a monolayer; and o fill the channel with a liquid sample,
    - calculating the concentration of second fluorescent molecules in the sample based on the combined fluorescences φ ^ 1 .
    2015/5687
    Another object of the invention is a system for the embodiment of the aforementioned method B e E , 2015/5687, in particular a system for determining fluorescences {<p- pe } îe] i, 2, ..., 1] of a sequence I of fluorescent microparticles {μ / ',} i e {i, 2, comprising:
    - at least one channel for receiving the series I of fluorescent microparticles {μΡι} i e ] i, 2, ..., /] in a monolayer arrangement;
    - an acquisition unit for obtaining a digital fluorescent image of the monolayer arrangement of the series of fluorescent microparticles {μΡι} 1 ^ 1,2, ..., /] in the channel;
    - a calculation unit for calculating the fluorescence {<fi Pe } îe] i, 2, ..., /] on the basis of the digital fluorescent image obtained, the calculation unit exclusively based on pixels of the obtained digital fluorescent image that with said fluorescent microparticle μΡ [corresponds, a first fluorescence qj l . tieas , characterized in that the calculation unit calculates per fluorescent microparticle μΡι in the series of fluorescent microparticles {μΡι} i e ] i, 2, ..., i]:
    - a cross-talk fluorescence contribution <pf ross in the first fluorescence of said fluorescent microparticle μΡ, from other fluorescent microparticles {μΡ 7 } j * i in the series of fluorescent microparticles {μ / ',} i e ] i, 2, .. j], wherein said calculation is based on first fluorescence (φ ^ 113 ) t . of said other microparticles; and
    - the fluorescence <pf pe of said fluorescent microparticle μΡ, by correcting the first fluorescence (p ™ eas thereof with the cross-talk fluorescence contribution <pf ross) .
    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
    The present invention will be better understood upon reading the following description, which is provided solely as an example in connection with the accompanying drawings, the same reference numerals designating the same or similar elements, of which:
    Figure 1 is a schematic view of a coded microparticle and a multiplex analyzer using such a microparticle, according to the current state of the art;
    Figure 2 illustrates a multiplex analysis of a sample using the microparticle and analyzer of Figure 1;
    Figure 3 illustrates fluorescence differences from a monoplex and a multiplex assay;
    Figure 4 illustrates a microparticle arrangement for determining a fluorescence decay profile according to the invention;
    figures 5 and 6 illustrate the fluorescent decay profile and the relative fluorescence decay profile according to the invention, respectively;
    Figure 7 illustrates a model adapted to the relative fluorescence decay profile;
    Figure 8 illustrates a biplex assay with clear and dark microparticles;
    2015/5687 figures 9 and 10 illustrate the effect of the cross-talk effect in the measured biplex fluorescents B ti E e 2015/5687 ; and
    figures 11 and 12 illustrate the fluorescence of the dark microparticles before and after the crosstalk correction according to the invention, respectively.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
    An embodiment of the invention based on the Evalution TM system explained earlier is now described. The embodiment differs from the Evalution TM system by additional processing according to the invention. In particular, computer instructions and parameters are stored in the memory of the Evalution ™ system to process the obtained digital fluorescence images of the channels in order to correct the cross-talk effect calculated by the system in the fluorescence cp meas . The corrected fluorescence (p spec is then used to calculate the combined values of fluorescence voor ρορ for the populations and the biomarker concentrations [h] in the examined sample.
    In particular, the measured fluorescence of a particular microparticle μΡ ^ in a series of microparticles {μ Ij} i e {i, 2, .., /} in a channel 22 of the cartridge 20 is equal to:
    (pj , eas = φ ζρ β + yCross (1) where the fluorescence φ · ; μ <: of a microparticle μ / y corresponds to the fluorescence produced by the microparticle μ / j and <p8 ross is the fluorescence from other microparticles {μΡ7} j * i superimposed on fluorescence φ '· ρί ', that is, the crosstalk contribution from said other microparticles {μΡ7}
    According to the invention, the cross-talk contribution (pj 1055) is modeled as a sum of individual contributions, each with an isotropic decay profile, i.e.:
    cross t
    (2) wherein a unitary cross-talk fluorescence contribution in the first fluorescence (p'j ' eas of the j is the fluorescent microparticle μΡ 7 which depends solely on the distance d i7 between microparticles μΡ, and μΡ 7 , for example the distance between the respective centers of the microparticles.
    2015/5687
    If the fluorescents <p S j Pe are not available for the crosstalk correction, BziEj2015 / 5687 are approximate given by <pj Pe = <pin axis , which compares:
    meas t
    i
    m meas rj
    (3).
    In a first variant, <pf pe is thus calculated according to:
    i
    meas t ^ αιι . φ ρρ j * i (4)
    Although this variant shows good results when correcting the crosstalk effect, the following calculation yields a better correction.
    In particular, one gets by setting Vi, a ü = 1 and storing the <z i7 in a matrix A:
    (5)
    , n meas
    Ψΐ -1 t meas j
    (5)
    All fluorescence (p spe are thus calculated together according to:
    , n meas
    Ψΐ-1
    meas
    (6)
    As discussed further below, the unitary cross-talk fluorescence contributions are calculated according to the following equation:
    2015/5687
    BE2015 / 5687
    N ai J = (7) n = 1 where N is an integer greater than or equal to 2 and θ η , k n and β η are predetermined identical parameters, regardless of the microparticles, that are in the memory of the computer 30 being saved.
    In particular with regard to the microparticles of the Evalution ™ system, N = shows good results in the approach of the a t j.
    Based on the above, the computing unit 30 according to one embodiment of the invention thus calculates:
    (a) the position of the center of each microparticle (for example, the center of the disc-shaped microparticles) in the obtained digital fluorescent image of the channel and then calculates the distance (μΛ- per pair of microparticles (μΡ ^ μ / ^ ·) in said image μΡ);
    b) the unitary cross-talk fluorescence contributions according to equation (7);
    c) the matrix A according to equation (5) and the inverse A _1 thereof;
    d) the fluorescence φ [ ρβ according to equation (6).
    The determination of the unitary cross-talk fluorescence contribution with respect to Figures 4-7 is now described. A first step consists of creating at least one large field of view that contains only one clear microparticle. To take into account the possible influence of the multiplexing environment and the attributes of microparticles, a biplex assay is done with a lower number of clear microparticles (for example, fully clear biotin-RPE microparticles) and a large number of dark microparticles (for example, COOH microparticles). and a bright field image and a digital fluorescent image of the microparticles are obtained. Thus, the crosstalk decay profile can be measured on the pixels of the image ("the pixels") corresponding to the COOH microparticles around an isolated clear microparticle. A clear microparticle is considered isolated if the closest clear microparticle is at least 1000 pixels away. In addition, to increase the accuracy of the calculation, only clear microparticles are retained that have a minimum fluorescence ( measles and that have a homogeneous fluorescence distribution on their surface (for example, according to a coefficient of variation of the pixels of the clear microparticle). dark microparticles surrounded, isolated clear microparticle is illustrated in Figure 4A
    2015/5687
    13 4B illustrates showing the same microparticles. image with overexposure after processing at the COO B H E - 2015/5687
    To measure the influence on pixels at a distance from the center of the clear microparticle, in a second step, all pixels corresponding to the dark microparticles at a distance between d and d + p (where p is a predefined step, e.g. equal to 1), are pooled and their average fluorescence and average distance to the center of the clear microparticles are calculated. The pixels of the dark microparticles are selected with the bright field image.
    In Figure 5, the calculated average fluorescence is plotted over the calculated average distance. Each point on the graph corresponds to the average fluorescence of pixels at a given distance from one isolated, clear microparticle. The plateau to the right of the x-axis corresponds to the clear microparticle whose radius is represented by the black vertical line. Thus, the fluorescence after said line corresponds to a fluorescence halo that surrounds the clear microparticle, which halo has a fluorescence decay profile.
    To make the profiles comparable under different conditions, the relative fluorescence is calculated by dividing the average fluorescence of the bin by the fluorescence of the clear microparticle. Figure 6 illustrates the relative fluorescence decay profile corresponding to that of Figure 5. The values on the Y-axis of Figure 6 can be interpreted as the proportion of fluorescence of the clear microparticle that is at a given distance from the center of the clear microparticle for cross-talk.
    To assess the potential sources of variability, the determination of the relative fluorescence decay profiles for different exposure times, different buffers, instruments and microparticles was done. This study shows that the decay profile is essentially independent of the fluorescence of the clear microparticle, as well as the type of buffer used and the exposure conditions.
    In a further step, a selected model is fitted to the relative fluorescence decay profile. More specifically, the sum of exponential functions of equation (7) is chosen as a model, and in particular a sum of three exponential functions. Although flexible, this model still provides analytical expression between the relative cross-talk fluorescence and the distance from the center of the clear microparticle. The relative fluorescence decay profile has a complicated shape that may be difficult to sum up with a sum of three exponential functions
    2015/5687
    BE2015 / 5687 passes (plateau from 0 to ~ 50 pixels, then a steep slope to 85). To increase the fit of the model, the data from the steep slope is therefore ignored. This is justified by the fact that the distance corresponding to the steep slope is not filled by other microparticles. For example, in the Evalution TM system, the microparticle radius is approximately 56 pixels, and therefore the minimum distance between two microparticles is expected to be no less than 85 pixels. Thus, the model used for fitting the data in the Evalution TM is :
    atj = e -M d u -85 ) n = 1
    Figure 7 shows a detail of the relative fluorescence decay of Figure 6, the red line corresponding to the appropriate model. Any suitable model can of course be used.
    An example of the crosstalk effect correction is illustrated with reference to Figures 812. This example corresponds to a biplex assay, and thus two types of microparticles or populations, where a first microparticle population (biotin-RPE microparticles) is very clear compared to a second microparticle population (COOH microparticles). Figure 8A illustrates a bright field image of a channel that receives the two populations. As illustrated in Figure 8B, the population fluorescence of the clear microparticles for standard image capture conditions (e.g., excitation power = 10 mW, exposure of image capture = 40 ms) is 112 A.U. (Arbitrary Unit). Looking closely at Figure 8B, biotin-RPE microparticles are sharp, with no light halo around them, making it difficult to determine whether a cross-talk phenomenon is taking place. However, by increasing the contrast of the fluorescence image 8B to its maximum (considering, for example, that images are encoded at 8 bits, each pixel with an original fluorescence greater than or equal to it gets the set value 255 and the originally set to 0 pixels remain at 0 ), the crosstalk effect becomes clear (Figure 8C). By superimposing Figure 8A and Figure 8C (Figure 4D), it can be seen that the halos of the biotin RPE microparticles overflow the COOH microparticles. Figure 9 illustrates the accumulated fluorescence <Pcooh of the COOH population, calculated based on the measured fluorescence <P ™ Joh of COOH microparticles that belong to a circle with a radius of 250 pixels, as illustrated in the upper left part of Figure 9. fluorescence <Pcooh is illustrated here as a function of the number of biotin RPE microparticles in the circle. The fluorescence <Pcoo «of the COOH population positively correlates with the number of biotin RPE microparticles, illustrating the cross-talk phenomenon.
    2015/5687
    In particular, cross-talk effect results in an increase in value, such as woB E2015 / 5687 illustrated by the horizontal dotted line corresponding to the population fluorescence of COOH microparticles in a monoplex assay under the same procurement conditions (0.07 AU). For example, with one biotin RPE microparticle, the population fluorescence Pcooh of COOH population is 0.44 AU, that is, a six-fold increase in the monoplex value. This dependence on population fluorescence on the fluorescence of the other populations in a multiplex is disastrous for the precision of the assay and in particular can lead to false positive results. For example, in a cytokine assay, a population fluorescence of 0.07 AU for INF-g is not considered to be significantly above the blank fluorescence and is therefore called negative. However, a population fluorescence of 0.44 AU is well above the detection limit and corresponds to an estimated concentration of 10.3 pg / ml. Figure 10 illustrates the extrapolation of a six-fold fluorescence increase in an experiment with IFN-g and its effect on the estimated concentration using the calibration curve used to convert population fluorescence φ ρ < ^ 0Η to INF-g concentration.
    After applying the crosstalk correction according to the invention, the fluorescence measured on COOH microparticles should not be influenced by the fluorescence of clear microparticles that are in the same field of view. To verify this independence, the population fluorescence of COOH microparticles in multiplex assays is compared with a reference value. The reference value is the corresponding population fluorescence of COOH, as measured in a monoplex assay under the same test conditions.
    The statistic used for the comparison between COOH in monoplex and multiplex assays is
    the ratio: <Pm (multiplex) (simplex)
    If the signal intensity of COOH microparticles is not affected by the presence of the clear microparticles, the ratio p should be one. In the case of cross-talk between fluorescent and COOH microparticles, the ratio is expected to be greater than. Ratios p must be calculated before and after crosstalk removal ("decrosstalk") to evaluate the improvement of signal robustness to the plex level induced by the crosstalk correction.
    Figures 11 and 12 illustrate fluorescence measured on the COOH microparticles before and after the crosstalk correction, respectively. The first two box plots, to the left of the figures, present the fluorescence values in the monoplex assay. The following box plots on the right
    2015/5687 present the COOH fluorescence values in the different biplex conditions B and E2015 / 5687 (different ratios of clear / COOH microparticles). The labels on the x-axis contain the approximate percentage of clear microparticles in the channel and the code type of clear microparticles in the biplex (276 for 100% biotin-RPE coupled microparticles and 436 for 500% biotin-RPE coupled microparticles).
    Figure 11 shows that the uncorrected COOH fluorescence shows strong correlation with the percentage of clear microparticles in the channel. The COOH population fluorescence in channels where 80% of the microparticles are 100% biotin RPE is more than 40 times higher than their population value in monoplex channels. As can be seen in Figure 12, the correlation is significantly reduced after applying the decrosstalking algorithm. For example, the ratios for the channels with 80% clear microparticles are lowered to 0.87 and 1.71, respectively. In qualitative terms, the box plots for the other test conditions (exposure time, type of buffer or out of focus configurations) show the same behavior.
    权利要求:
    Claims (18)
    [1]
    CONCLUSIONS
    A method for determining fluorescence values {<pf pe } of a series I of fluorescent microparticles {μ Ij} i e {i, 2, ..., /} of a multiplexed analysis, wherein said microparticles are in a monolayer arrangement, which method includes:
    - obtaining a digital fluorescence image of the series of fluorescent microparticles {/ tPj ie {lj2 ..... /} ; and
    - a fluorescent microparticle μΡι in the series of fluorescent microparticles {μ / j} ίε {ΐ, 2, calculating a fluorescence value gj 6 '15, solely on the basis of pixels of the acquired image which correspond to said fluorescent microparticle μ Ij, with the characterized in that the method comprises calculating the fluorescence value <p t spe of said fluorescent microparticle μ / j by the first fluorescence (hp 160-5 thereof by means of a cross-talk fluorescence contribution (pi ross in said first fluorescence (p} 1 '^ from other fluorescent microparticles in the array of fluorescent microparticles {μ / y} i e {i, 2, ..., /}.
    [2]
    Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the calculation of the fluorescence value <pf pe comprises:
    - per fluorescent microparticle μ / y in the series of fluorescent microparticles {μ / j} ίε {ΐ, 2, calculating a position X, in the digital fluorescence image;
    - modeling the first fluorescence value (p ™′ as a function of the positions
    PGliefi, and the fluorescence values of all fluorescent microparticles ^ Pj ie {12 ..... n ; and
    - calculating the inverse of said function to obtain the fluorescence value (p spe .
    [3]
    Method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the calculation of fluorescence (p spe is performed on the basis of the following equation:
    where <pj Pe is the fluorescence of the j the fluorescent microparticle μΡ] and a unitary cross-talk fluorescence contribution in the first fluorescence (pj ' l:!: s of the j is the fluorescent microparticle μΡ 7 ·, where the unitary cross-talk fluorescence contribution depends exclusively on of the distance d i7 between the fluorescent microparticles μ / y and
    PPj
    2015/5687
    [4]
    Method according to claim 3, characterized in that the method comprises:
    - calculating the distance d p between the i th and the j the fluorescent microparticle in the digital fluorescence image;
    - calculate per unit microparticles (μΡ ^ μΡ; ') in the series I of fluorescent microparticles the unitary cross-talk fluorescence contribution a t j of said pair (μΡί, μΡΡ) based on the distance d ^;
    - calculating the fluorescence {cpf pe } ie {i, 2, ..., 1} of the series of fluorescent microparticles {μΡι} i e [i, 2, based on the following equation:
    ' n meas
    Ψ1, n meas Ψ2 / n meas
    Ψΐ -1, n meas
    [5]
    Method according to claim 3 or 4, characterized in that the unitary cross-talk fluorescence of the microparticle in the first fluorescence (p ™ eas of the fluorescent microparticle is calculated on the basis of the following equation:
    N
    OCij = ^ (önn = 1 where N is an integer greater than or equal to 2 and θ η , k n and β η are predetermined parameters.
    [6]
    6. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that each fluorescent microparticle μ Ij of the series of fluorescent microparticles μΡι} i {e p, 2, ..., 1}, an identification code / d m (i) of a set of M comprises different unique identification codes, said identification code 1d M (ij being readable by processing a digital image of said fluorescent microparticle μΡι, and the method further comprising:
    - obtaining a digital image of the series of fluorescent microparticles {μΡι} ie [1, 2, ..., I} ;
    - reading the identification code Id m (P) of each microparticle μ / y in the digital image; and
    - unique identification codes different from each identification code Id m of the M series [id m ) me} i, 2, ..., M} from a combined fluorescence v'j, j based on the fluorescence <p t spe of the fluorescent microparticles comprising said identification code.
    2015/5687
    BE2015 / 5687
    [7]
    Method according to claim 6, characterized in that each fluorescent microparticle μΡ ^ of the series of fluorescent microparticles {μΙ}} i e {i, 2, .., /} comprises a surface covered with fluorescent complexes which is uniquely belong to the identification code of said fluorescent microparticle ƒ (/ ', wherein said complexes comprise first non-fluorescent molecules attached to the microparticles and second fluorescent molecules bound to the first non-fluorescent molecules.
    [8]
    Method according to claim 7, characterized in that the microparticles have the same dimensions.
    [9]
    Method according to claim 7 or 8, characterized in that the method comprises:
    - prior to obtaining the digital fluorescence image of the series of fluorescent microparticles {μΙ}} i e {i, 2, .., /}:
    o the microparticles without placing second fluorescent molecules bound to the first non-fluorescent molecules in a channel in order to arrange the microparticles in a monolayer; and o fill the channel with a liquid sample,
    - calculating the concentration of second fluorescent molecules in the sample based on the combined fluorescence ies ^.
    [10]
    10. Fluorescent determination system {<Pi Pe } ie {i, 2, ..., i] of a series I of fluorescent microparticles {μΡί} i e {i, 2, .., /} comprising:
    - at least one channel to receive the series of Ivan fluorescent microparticles {ƒ (//} i e {i, 2, .., /} in a monolayer arrangement;
    an acquisition unit for obtaining a digital fluorescent image of the monolayer arrangement of the series of fluorescent microparticles Wä ie {i, 2 ..... /} in the channel;
    - a calculation unit for calculating the fluorescence {<p- pe }} e {i, 2, based on the obtained digital fluorescent image, the calculation unit exclusively based on pixels of obtained digital fluorescent image that with said fluorescent microparticle μΙ} corresponds to a first fluorescence ^ meas, characterized in that the calculation unit calculates per fluorescent microparticle μΡ ^ in the series of fluorescent microparticles [ƒ // ',} i e {i, 2, .., /}:
    - a cross-talk fluorescence contribution (pi ross in the first fluorescence <ρ ™ βαί; of said fluorescent microparticle from other fluorescent microparticles {p-Pj} j * i in the series of fluorescent microparticles {μΡ,} i e {i, 2, .., /},
    2015/5687 wherein said calculation based on first fluorescence is {(p '' eas } ίψ . VBn mentioned other microparticles; and
    - the fluorescence <p t spe of said fluorescent microparticle μΡ, by the first fluorescence <ρ ™ βα5 thereof by means of the cross-talk contribution to correct cpcross fluorescence.
    [11]
    A system according to claim 10, characterized in that the calculation unit calculates the fluorescence value (p ^ pe by:
    - calculate a position in the digital fluorescence image for each fluorescent microparticle μΡι in the fluorescent microparticle series {μΡι} ie {i, 2, ..., 1};
    - model the first fluorescence value as a function of the positions ί ^ ί} ίε {ΐ, and the fluorescence values of all fluorescent microparticles {μ ^} ie {lj2 ..... /} ; and
    - to calculate the inverse of said function in order to obtain the fluorescence value <p t spe .
    [12]
    12. A system as claimed in claim 10 or 11, characterized in that the computer unit of the fluorescence (p t spe on the basis of the following equation to calculate:
    wherein <pj Pe is the fluorescence of the j the fluorescent microparticle μΡ] and a unitary cross-talk fluorescence contribution in the first fluorescence of the j is the fluorescent microparticle μΡ], wherein the unitary cross-talk fluorescence contribution aij depends solely on the distance d t j between the fluorescent microparticles μ / ', and pPj
    [13]
    A system according to claim 12, characterized in that the computer unit:
    - the distance dp between the i th and the j the fluorescent microparticle in the digital calculates fluorescence image;
    - calculates per unit microparticles (μ / 3 ,, μ / 3 , ·) in the series I of fluorescent microparticles the unitary cross-talk fluorescence contribution a t j of said pair (μΡ ^ μ / 3 ·) based on the distance dp;
    - the fluorescences {<p t spe} pe {i, 2, ..., 1} of the set of fluorescent microparticles [PPI] pe (i, 2, ..., i} on the basis of the following equation to calculate:
    2015/5687
    BE2015 / 5687, n meas
    -11-1 , n meas ψΐ
    "Me as
    Ψ1, n meas Ψ2
    [14]
    A system according to claim 13, characterized in that the unitary cross-talk fluorescence of the microparticle in the first fluorescence of the fluorescent microparticle is calculated on the basis of the following equation:
    N
    CCij = ^ {θ η . e - kn ^ j-ßn ^ n = 1 where N is an integer greater than or equal to 2 and d n , k n and β η are predetermined parameters.
    [15]
    A system according to any one of claims 10-14, characterized in that each fluorescent microparticle μΡι of the series of fluorescent microparticles {μΡί} i e {i, 2, .., /} an identification code / d m (i) of a series M comprises different unique identification codes, said identification code 1d M (ij being readable by processing a digital image of said fluorescent microparticle μ Ij, and that the computer unit:
    - obtains a digital image of the series of fluorescent microparticles {μΡι} i e {i, 2, .., /};
    - the identification code Id m (i) of each microparticle reads μ / j in the digital image; and
    - for each identification code Id m of the series M different unique identification codes {id m } m e {i, 2, ..., M} calculates a combined fluorescence based on the fluorescence <p t spe of the fluorescent microparticles comprising said identification code .
    [16]
    16. A system according to claim 15, characterized in that each fluorescent microparticle μΡι of the series of fluorescent microparticles {μΡι} i ∈ {i, 2, .., /} comprises a surface that has been covered with fluorescing complexes which in a unique way to the identification code Id m (i) of said fluorescent microparticle μ / j, wherein said complexes comprise first non-fluorescent molecules attached to the microparticles and second fluorescent molecules bound to the first non-fluorescent molecules.
    [17]
    A system according to claim 16, characterized in that the microparticles have the same dimensions.
    2015/5687
    BE2015 / 5687
    [18]
    A system according to claim 16 or 17, characterized in that the system comprises at least one channel and means for, prior to obtaining the digital fluorescence image of the series of fluorescent microparticles {pPi} i e {i, 2, ... , rp
    - the microparticles without placing second fluorescent molecules bound to the first non-fluorescent molecules in the channel in order to arrange the microparticles in a monolayer; and
    - filling the channel with a liquid sample, and that the calculation unit calculates the concentration of second fluorescent molecules in the sample based on the combined fluorescences φ 1 ^.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    US8003312B2|2011-08-23|Multiplex cellular assays using detectable cell barcodes
    US20120015825A1|2012-01-19|Analytical systems and methods with software mask
    BE1025903B1|2019-08-12|Cross-talk correction with multiplexing analysis of biological sample
    JP2013531787A|2013-08-08|Holographic fluctuation microscope apparatus and method for determining particle motility and / or cell dispersion
    Wong et al.2014|Mobile app-based quantitative scanometric analysis
    JP3929057B2|2007-06-13|Luminescence intensity analysis method and apparatus
    EP1548423A1|2005-06-29|Image processing method for biochemical test
    JP4979516B2|2012-07-18|Image reading method and apparatus
    US20200132600A1|2020-04-30|Digital molecular assays
    Harink et al.2019|An open-source software analysis package for Microspheres with Ratiometric Barcode Lanthanide Encoding |
    Rodriques et al.2019|A theoretical analysis of single molecule protein sequencing via weak binding spectra
    JP2005017081A|2005-01-20|Screening method and device for anti-cancer active material
    Mehta et al.2009|A computational approach to inferring cellular protein‐binding affinities from quantitative fluorescence resonance energy transfer imaging
    KR102048599B1|2019-11-25|Determination method, determination device, determination system, and program
    JP4728025B2|2011-07-20|Cell image analyzer
    US20150160244A1|2015-06-11|Method and system for estimating the quantity of an analyte contained in a liquid
    WO2009007202A1|2009-01-15|Method for quantifying an underlying property of a multitude of samples
    EP1010764A2|2000-06-21|Hydridization detection method using biochips
    JP4321716B2|2009-08-26|Fluorescence image correction method, apparatus, and program
    RU200805U1|2020-11-12|Fluorescent Biochip Analyzer
    US20040019433A1|2004-01-29|Method for locating areas of interest of a substrate
    KR20190136650A|2019-12-10|Fluorescence optical appratus and system for biosensor
    CN109073554B|2021-08-17|Method for measuring bioaffinity by using two-photon excitation fluorescence
    WO2021178883A1|2021-09-10|Automated fluorescence imaging and single cell segmentation
    WO2015000720A1|2015-01-08|System for determining a quantitative number being indicative of the concentration of target elements in a fluid
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    CN108139325A|2018-06-08|
    EP3353532A1|2018-08-01|
    AU2016328559A1|2018-03-01|
    BE1025903A1|2019-08-06|
    JP2018529947A|2018-10-11|
    US20180275059A1|2018-09-27|
    US10527549B2|2020-01-07|
    WO2017050788A1|2017-03-30|
    EP3147650A1|2017-03-29|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    WO2006015251A2|2004-07-29|2006-02-09|The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York|System and method for cross-talk cancellation in a multilane fluorescence detector|
    US20110306506A1|2008-12-23|2011-12-15|Biocartis Sa|Assay device and method for performing biological assays|
    US20120015825A1|2010-07-06|2012-01-19|Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc.|Analytical systems and methods with software mask|
    US20080241843A1|2006-12-21|2008-10-02|Stanford University|Single-cell analysis systems, methods of counting molecules in a single-cell, cylindrical fluorescence detection systems|
    CN101889192B|2007-10-25|2012-07-04|纽约州立大学研究基金会|Single photon spectrometer|
    RU2434288C1|2010-06-08|2011-11-20|Закрытое Акционерное Общество "Импульс"|Method of correcting digital images|
    EP2484447A1|2011-02-07|2012-08-08|Biocartis SA|Improved encoded microcarriers, assay system using them and method for performing an assay|
    US20120315622A1|2011-05-09|2012-12-13|Rotman M Boris|System for detecting and enumerating biological particles|EP3764096A4|2018-03-07|2021-04-28|Konica Minolta, Inc.|Image processing method, image processing device, and program|
    CN109859188B|2019-01-31|2021-04-06|领航基因科技（杭州）有限公司|Fluorescence crosstalk correction method based on mean shift algorithm and application thereof|
    WO2020235283A1|2019-05-22|2020-11-26|株式会社日立ハイテク|Analysis device and analysis method|
    法律状态:
    2019-10-10| FG| Patent granted|Effective date: 20190812 |
    2021-07-15| MM| Lapsed because of non-payment of the annual fee|Effective date: 20201031 |
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    EP15186210.9|2015-09-22|
    EP15186210.9A|EP3147650A1|2015-09-22|2015-09-22|Cross-talk correction in multiplexing analysis of biological sample|
    [返回顶部]